From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI Video: Ignore devices that aren't present in hardware Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:24:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20080703192405.GB32260@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200807031805.52883.trenn@suse.de> <20080703160822.GA29110@srcf.ucam.org> <200807031815.13291.trenn@suse.de> <20080703161643.GB29110@srcf.ucam.org> <20080703162134.GI6755@corsac.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080703162134.GI6755@corsac.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yves-Alexis Perez Cc: Thomas Renninger , ak@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Julia Jomantaite , marcus@better.se, dannybaumann@web.de List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > I dont know if it's the same thing, but I remember at one time that when > pressing my brightness keys (on a T61, intel graphics), the acpi event > appeared in /proc/acpi/event like 1 second later. I didn't check > precisely, but it could really be those 750ms. Irrc, this was only > happening after first suspend to ram. Yes, it's the same issue. > Do these patches mean that, maybe in 2.6.27, brightness keys would work > directly from kernel, without needing hal, gnome-power-manager or > anything else, like X? Right. > I can try those patches and report back, but on which kernel should I > apply them? 2.6.26-rc8? Or some git? It's against drm git - search the dri-devel archives for the patch. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org