From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Battery life difference
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:23:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080705082352.4b6be669@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31e679430807050617u3fc706fasee9bb43a151c501f@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:17:01 +0300
"Felipe Balbi" <felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I bought two x61s for testing purposes. One of them is running
> windows XP and the other one is running clean ubuntu 8.04 with kernel
> 2.6.24-19. The problem is that on windows that battery lasts around
> 3h30min and with linux 1h30min.
>
> 2 hours is a huge difference. Here's the scenario:
>
> . x61s with windows xp
> wifi on but not connected to any network, bluetooth on,
> display is in the less brighten state.
>
> . x61s with ubuntu 8.04
> all radios off (modules removed and hw switch off),
Which wireless is this? Same for graphics
>
> Anyways, do we reach D2/D3 states anywhere ? I mean without
> context save/restore we can't reach D3 and almost no D2 as well.
these don't give you all that much nowadays
>
> Any comments ?
>
There's a few things you can do to help stuff along; make sure you're
using AHCI.
Also take a look at
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/5/8/1771024 because
these patches save like 0.75W in our lab.
To be honest, I'm surprised at your results; in our testing (with a
different distro though) we don't see such a difference and Linux is
doing rather well.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-05 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-05 13:17 Battery life difference Felipe Balbi
2008-07-05 13:36 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-05 14:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-07-09 20:29 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-10 5:16 ` Tino Keitel
2008-07-05 15:23 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-07-05 15:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-07-05 15:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-05 17:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-07-05 19:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-05 19:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-07-09 20:32 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-06 17:21 ` Tino Keitel
2008-07-07 9:48 ` Filippo Zangheri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080705082352.4b6be669@infradead.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox