From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: next-0708: build failure at drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:29:31 +0200 Message-ID: <200807082229.33016.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200807081858.16321.rjw@sisk.pl> <200807081040.38777.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200807081040.38777.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Alexander Beregalov , ak@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , pm list , David Howells List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 8 of July 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:58 am Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, 8 of July 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > > > 2008/7/8 Rafael J. Wysocki : > > > > On Tuesday, 8 of July 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > > > >> Hi Rafael > > > >> > > > >> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c: In function 'acpi_pci_sleep_wake': > > > >> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c:311: error: implicit declaration of function > > > >> 'acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake' > > > > > > > > I guess this is a compilation with CONFIG_ACPI=y and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > > > unset. > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > > > In that case the appended patch should help. Please test and report > > > > back (I can't test linux-next compilation at the moment). > > > > > > Compilation test passed and the kernel can boot. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jesse, could you please apply the patch below to the linux-next branch, on > > top of the PCI wake-up patchset? > > > > Rafael > > David sent me one just like this at 7am this morning, just applied and pushed > (along with Alexander's tested-by). OK, thanks. Would you like me to send the Stephen's fix for compilation on ppc64 (CONFIG_PM unset)? Rafael