Re: [PATCH 8/8] PCI: Simplify PCI device PM code (rev. 4)

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Friday, 11 of July 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > 
> > PCI: Simplify PCI device PM code (rev. 4)
> > 
> > If the offset of PCI device's PM capability in its configuration
> > space, the mask of states that the device supports PME# from and the
> > D1 and D2 support bits are cached in the corresponding
> > struct pci_dev, the PCI device PM code can be simplified quite a bit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c        |  118 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >  include/linux/pci.h      |    8 ++-
> >  include/linux/pci_regs.h |    1 
> >  3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-pci/include/linux/pci.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pci.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ linux-pci/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ struct pci_dev {
> >  	pci_power_t     current_state;  /* Current operating state. In ACPI-speak,
> >  					   this is D0-D3, D0 being fully functional,
> >  					   and D3 being off. */
> > +	int		pm_cap;		/* PM capability offset in the
> > +					   configuration space */
> > +	unsigned int	pme_support:5;	/* Bitmask of states from which PME#
> > +					   can be generated */
> > +	unsigned int	d1_support:1;	/* Low power state D1 is supported */
> > +	unsigned int	d2_support:1;	/* Low power state D2 is supported */
> > +	unsigned int	no_d1d2:1;	/* Only allow D0 and D3 */
> 
> Uh, "D1", "D2", then "no D1D2" ?

Yes.  They are used for different things.

> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (pmc & PCI_PM_CAP_PME_MASK) {
> > +	dev->pm_cap = pm;
> > +
> > +	dev->d1_support = false;
> > +	dev->d2_support = false;
> 
> I thought d1_support is unsigned int, not bool?

They are always used as bools, though.

Thanks,
Rafael