From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: akataria@vmware.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
TJ <linux@tjworld.net>
Subject: Re: acpi based pci gap calculation - v3
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:06:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807160906.43632.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487D89E3.9070604@linux.intel.com>
On Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:40 pm Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:54 pm Alok Kataria wrote:
> >> I have tested it with couple of different BIOS settings and it seems to
> >> work as it should.
> >>
> >>> Most of the PCI bugs we
> >>> have at the moment are related to PCI resource allocation failures. My
> >>> hope is that finding more space will fix most of them. Assuming this
> >>> patch doesn't have any dependencies, I can put it in my linux-next
> >>> branch.
> >>
> >> No dependencies, I had added a function e820_search_gap which is used by
> >> this patch. This function is already in the mainline tree.
> >> Thanks for applying.
> >
> > Ok, I stuffed it in my linux-next branch. I'll let it sit there for a
> > day or so though, just to shake out any build problems etc. in linux-next
> > before asking Linus to pull the whole lot.
>
> For me it seems a little risky to push up that early. I think it would
> be better to let it sit longer in linux-next for this. After all this is
> a major change how IO resources are allocated. That is why I didn't pull
> it into the ACPI release branch.
The only problem there is that linux-next doesn't get nearly the sort of
testing coverage we need for this kind of change. It's also small, and
reverting it is easy, so if we run into big problems that we can't fix we can
always back it out...
I'm interested in hearing people's thoughts on this.
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-16 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 18:59 acpi based pci gap calculation - v3 Alok Kataria
2008-07-15 20:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-15 20:54 ` Alok Kataria
2008-07-15 22:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-15 23:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-16 5:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-16 16:06 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2008-07-16 16:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 0:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-17 21:31 ` Alok Kataria
[not found] ` <1216663147.26169.5.camel@alok-dev1>
[not found] ` <200807221450.52114.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-22 22:52 ` Alok Kataria
2008-07-23 7:13 ` TJ
2008-07-23 16:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-23 17:10 ` Alok Kataria
2008-07-23 17:52 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-23 18:02 ` Alok Kataria
2008-07-16 5:42 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807160906.43632.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@tjworld.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox