public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI updates
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:26:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807161926.45975.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807161751490.2959@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:53:55 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Well, I haven't actually seen Len's original tree, so maybe the stuff
> > Andi pushed was just the stuff he had queued up independently. I guess I
> > shouldn't judge before I'm sure.
>
> No, he rebased it - the three commits you shared are now separate ones.

Well, I could have misunderstood what we talked about; I guess I just assumed 
Andi & I would chat before sending out our pull requests.  I'll be sure to 
coordinate better next time.

> Most of the conflicts seem to have been due tot he x86 tree changes
> though. But it seems I didn't mess up too much: at least the result booted
> for me without complaints. So I pushed out my resolution.
>
> Jesse, can you please double-check it?

Just looked, seems fine.  I'd pat you on the head to reassure you about it, 
but my arms aren't quite long enough...

I'll dig around some more for git best practices too.  Based on what I've seen 
of the x86 tree I don't have nearly enough branches (though on the plus side, 
I almost never rebase since I don't want to hose any downstream users, and I 
don't merge from your tree until after you've pulled to avoid cluttering up 
the log).

Thanks,
Jesse

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-17  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-16 21:45 Please pull ACPI updates Andi Kleen
2008-07-16 22:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-16 23:33   ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-16 23:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-16 23:51       ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-17  0:32         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  0:53           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  2:26             ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2008-07-17  2:56               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  6:45           ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 15:06             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17  6:40       ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 15:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 18:49           ` Len Brown
2008-07-17 19:12             ` Harvey Harrison
2008-07-17 19:50               ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 19:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 19:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 21:15             ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-17 23:11           ` [PATCH] Revert duplicate "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled" commit (was: Please pull ACPI updates) Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-17 23:25             ` [PATCH] Revert duplicate "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled" commit Andi Kleen
2008-07-18  0:07             ` [PATCH] Revert duplicate "ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled" commit (was: Please pull ACPI updates) Thomas Gleixner
2008-07-17  6:47     ` Please pull ACPI updates Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 15:18       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 15:47         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 16:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 16:23           ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 19:11             ` Ray Lee
2008-07-17 19:49               ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 20:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 20:14                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 20:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-17 20:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-18 13:25                       ` Olivier Galibert
2008-07-18 15:57                         ` Ray Lee
2008-07-17 20:34                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-17 20:11                 ` Ray Lee
2008-07-17 20:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-18  6:39                     ` david
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-24 20:36 Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807161926.45975.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox