From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yves-Alexis Perez Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] thinkpad_acpi: fingers off backlight if video.ko is serving this functionality Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:18:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20080717111808.GC16009@corsac.net> References: <1216205553-8486-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <20080716124703.GA376@srcf.ucam.org> <20080716133839.GB3329@khazad-dum.debian.net> <200807161727.57026.trenn@suse.de> <20080716152938.GA8676@srcf.ucam.org> <487F0C9B.4010502@linux.intel.com> <20080717104622.GA24906@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from molly.corsac.net ([81.57.48.219]:46805 "EHLO molly.corsac.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbYGQLSM (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:18:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080717104622.GA24906@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Andi Kleen , Thomas Renninger , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au, rui.zhang@intel.com, corentincj@iksaif.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dannybaumann@web.de, marcus@better.se, mzxreary@0pointer.de, carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk, malattia@linux.it On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > The opregion brightness control code is part of the DRM tree, not ACPI. > It ought to be entirely orthogonal to Thomas' patches. For an "end user", what does this mean? What patches should we apply, against which tree, in order to be able to test and validate Thomas's patches? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis