From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Please pull ACPI tree Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:23:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20080721142343.GA11345@elte.hu> References: <20080721114321.GA28786@basil.nowhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55204 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752033AbYGUOXz (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:23:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080721114321.GA28786@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen wrote: > This reverts some double commits and a trouble some FADT patch. > Andi Kleen (4): > Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled." in that commit log you say: Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled." Revert double commit by mistake. Noticed by Thomas Gleixner. it wasnt just "noticed" by Thomas, he sent a reverter patch with commit message and patch included. Why didnt you simply apply the patch from Thomas? Ingo