Please pull ACPI tree

Please pull ACPI tree

[Andi Kleen]

This reverts some double commits and a trouble some FADT patch.

Also some last minute patches.

The following changes since commit 5b664cb235e97afbf34db9c4d77f08ebd725335e:
  Linus Torvalds (1):
        Merge branch 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../mfasheh/ocfs2

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-acpi-merge-2.6 release-2.6.27

Andi Kleen (4):
      Revert "Fix FADT parsing"
      Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled."
      Merge branch 'merge' into release-2.6.27
      Revert "ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled"

Bjorn Helgaas (1):
      ACPI: stop complaints about interrupt link End Tags and blank IRQ descriptors

Zhao Yakui (2):
      ACPI: Ignore _BQC object when registering backlight device
      ACPI : Set FAN device to correct state in boot phase

 drivers/acpi/bay.c           |    3 --
 drivers/acpi/dock.c          |    3 --
 drivers/acpi/glue.c          |    3 --
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c      |   31 +++++++++++++++++++----------
 drivers/acpi/tables/tbfadt.c |   17 +++++----------
 drivers/acpi/thermal.c       |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/video.c         |   14 +++++++++++-
 7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Re: Please pull ACPI tree

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> This reverts some double commits and a trouble some FADT patch.

> Andi Kleen (4):
>       Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled."

in that commit log you say:

   Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled."
   Revert double commit by mistake. Noticed by Thomas Gleixner.

it wasnt just "noticed" by Thomas, he sent a reverter patch with commit 
message and patch included. Why didnt you simply apply the patch from 
Thomas?

	Ingo

Re: Please pull ACPI tree

[Andi Kleen]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 04:23:43PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> 
> > This reverts some double commits and a trouble some FADT patch.
> 
> > Andi Kleen (4):
> >       Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled."
> 
> in that commit log you say:
> 
>    Revert "dock: bay: Don't call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled."
>    Revert double commit by mistake. Noticed by Thomas Gleixner.
> 
> it wasnt just "noticed" by Thomas, he sent a reverter patch with commit 
> message and patch included. Why didnt you simply apply the patch from 
> Thomas?

Of course so that you have something to complain about. I know
that is your favorite pastime in the last months, so I didn't want to deny
you the fun.

Seriously, typing in git revert is the way to apply a revert.
I could have cut'n'pasted his commit message, but it didn't seem
to make much difference.

-Andi (who is amazed he has to write emails on trivialities like this)