From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: Debug interface used for error message cleanups Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:59:09 +0200 Message-ID: <200807311159.11276.trenn@suse.de> References: <1217449342-20312-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <9D39833986E69849A2A8E74C1078B6B3BFA624@orsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:53174 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751531AbYGaJ7N (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:59:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9D39833986E69849A2A8E74C1078B6B3BFA624@orsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Moore, Robert" Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com On Wednesday 30 July 2008 22:29:19 Moore, Robert wrote: > I'm going to go ahead and remove these from ACPICA. > > We added an "obsolete" warning in the header file some time ago, and I > think the time has come to remove them, especially in light of these > patches to Linux. Great thanks. If you are at that, do you think it makes sense to intruduce a GPE bit? Just leaving it unused for now? I didn't play with these much yet, Rui, do you think this makes sense? The fact there were several sever problems recently and GPEs possibly must get debugged by people writting other device drivers who do not know and do not want to know about the output of the other debug flags I thought this could make sense. Just an idea..., Thomas