From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Do not return true to all kind of Windows OSI calls Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:12:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20080803141231.GA14272@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1217632817.4610.6.camel@hidalgo> <200808021930.05643.trenn@suse.de> <20080802194843.GA1168@srcf.ucam.org> <200808031531.54725.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:47102 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755191AbYHCOMk (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2008 10:12:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808031531.54725.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: corsac@debian.org, ak@linux.intel.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, nokos@gmx.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hmh@debian.org On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 03:31:53PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > This is even worse, because that means that Lenovo and everyone > else who has to add Windows hotfixes to their BIOS and potentially > have to break their Linux supported OS by that cannot guarantee > their customers full Linux support (without providing a separate > Linux BIOS). That's fine. Where we diverge from the Windows behaviour we already have a bug. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org