From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yves-Alexis Perez Subject: Re: Check for ACPI backlight support otherwise use vendor ACPIdrivers - version 4 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:47:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20080804134711.GD2383@corsac.net> References: <1217605083-31003-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <20080804132450.GA3703@srcf.ucam.org> <20080804133017.GC2383@corsac.net> <200808041540.06023.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from molly.corsac.net ([81.57.48.219]:56485 "EHLO molly.corsac.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754217AbYHDNrN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:47:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808041540.06023.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Matthew Garrett , Zhang Rui , ak@linux.intel.com, nokos@gmx.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hmh@debian.org > > Hmhm so I should cherry-pick those patches (when merged) from drm-2.6 to > > linux-acpi-2.6/test plus the previously attached patch from Thomas? > > Best just try Matthews, together with mine which went into Andi's test tree > (version 4). > The additional patch I sent today is only needed if Matthew's does not work > for you and you want to try acpi_backlight=vendor on an IGD ThinkPad device. Ok so I'll cherry pick Matthew's patches, test and report back tonight. > When say in -rc5 you still have problems, the additional one can be > tested/added, so that all the rest does not need to be reverted and we do not > get regressions in 2.6.27. Hmh but linux-acpi-2.6/test is meant to be merged mainline for 2.6.27? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis