From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300 Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 21:30:14 +0200 Message-ID: <200808092130.14719.trenn@suse.de> References: <514e099a0808030300u140a0ae7m92a2e7294f39f7b7@mail.gmail.com> <200808092059.47863.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:44171 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257AbYHITNz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:13:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200808092059.47863.trenn@suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: S K Cc: Alan Jenkins , Zhao Yakui , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi, just that in case you try out kernels... On Saturday 09 August 2008 08:59:47 pm Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Friday 08 August 2008 08:23:25 pm S K wrote: > Mark Langsdorf reported some acpi breakage in .27-rc1, this could als= o be > the reason. --------- > I got a regression when updated from 2.6.27-rc1 ro > 2.6.27-rc2. =A0The noticeable symptom is the powernow-k8 > driver stopped working because the call to=20 > acpi_processor_register_performance() is returning > -EINVAL. ---------- So it's rc2 not rc1, but AFAIK your report should be older than rc2. There also was a similar report from Laurence Darby . He still posted on the old cpufreq list. Subject: Core 2 Duo E8400 stepping 6 not recognised A BIOS update helped. You may be able to google this out and compare his CPU_FREQ_DEBUG logs. Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html