From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Avoid critical temp shutdowns on specific ThinkPad T4x(p) and R50p Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:15:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20080811141552.GA28294@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200807301556.01815.trenn@suse.de> <200808111433.25275.trenn@suse.de> <20080811125519.GA26308@srcf.ucam.org> <200808111614.17161.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:43326 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751658AbYHKOP7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:15:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200808111614.17161.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Andi Kleen , Zhang Rui , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > So what is the status here, how should we proceed? > This isn't applied to any tree yet? > IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue them on > the test branch and keep it a while there. I posted them, got a small amount of feedback and no further acks. I can push them again. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org