From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Avoid critical temp shutdowns on specific ThinkPad T4x(p) and R50p Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:02:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20080812080249.GA11913@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200807301556.01815.trenn@suse.de> <200808111433.25275.trenn@suse.de> <20080811125519.GA26308@srcf.ucam.org> <200808111614.17161.trenn@suse.de> <20080811141552.GA28294@srcf.ucam.org> <48A1431A.8090300@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:33801 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751396AbYHLIC6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:02:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48A1431A.8090300@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Thomas Renninger , Zhang Rui , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > The problem seems to be that some people report this as a regression. > So either: Yeah. I'm unconvinced that this is the right solution for the Thinkpad case. > - It's an regression. Then something must have been changed. Do we know > what that is? > If it's really an regression then we need a low-risk fix for .27. The two choices would either seem to be that the system is now running hotter, or that we're getting spurious temperature readings. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org