public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: "Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	"Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:46:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809170746.43548.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080915095001.GA2015@elf.ucw.cz>

On Monday, 15 of September 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > Well, I read this part of the spec (2.0c, 3.0b) more carefully and it matches
> > what you're saying.  Moreover, my understanding of it is that we should
> > actually _clear_ the 64-bit vector on systems that support it, because
> > otherwise the BIOS is supposed to use it and call the wake-up code in protected
> > mode.
> > 
> > The appended patch is based on this observation.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> > 
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > 
> > ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector
> > 
> > According to the ACPI specification 2.0c and later, the 64-bit waking vector
> > should be cleared and the 32-bit waking vector should be used, unless we want
> > the wake-up code to be called by the BIOS in Protected Mode.  Moreover, some
> > systems (for example HP dv5-1004nr) are known to fail to resume if the 64-bit
> > waking vector is used.  Therefore, modify the code to clear the 64-bit waking
> > vector, for FACS version 1 or greater, and set the 32-bit one before suspend.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/hardware/hwsleep.c |   37 +++++++++++--------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > 
> > @@ -134,20 +132,7 @@ acpi_get_firmware_waking_vector(acpi_phy
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Get the vector */
> > -
> > -	if ((facs->length < 32) || (!(facs->xfirmware_waking_vector))) {
> > -		/*
> > -		 * ACPI 1.0 FACS or short table or optional X_ field is zero
> > -		 */
> > -		*physical_address =
> > -		    (acpi_physical_address) facs->firmware_waking_vector;
> > -	} else {
> > -		/*
> > -		 * ACPI 2.0 FACS with valid X_ field
> > -		 */
> > -		*physical_address =
> > -		    (acpi_physical_address) facs->xfirmware_waking_vector;
> > -	}
> > +	*physical_address = (acpi_physical_address)facs->firmware_waking_vector;
> >  
> >  	return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK);
> >  }
> 
> Actually, I guess we should kill acpi_get_firmware_waking_vector: It
> is completely useless, and it is indeed never used in whole Linux...

Well, it's under '#ifdef 0' anyway, but I wanted it to be consistent with the
code we actually use. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-17  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-04  5:51 [PATCH]: ACPI : Set 32bit and 64bit waking vector in FCAS table Zhao Yakui
2008-09-04  8:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-04  9:18   ` Zhang Rui
2008-09-04  9:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-04 12:07       ` Matthew Garrett
2008-09-05  1:17         ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-05  1:21           ` Li, Shaohua
2008-09-05 10:48             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-06 11:13             ` [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-14 11:46               ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-14 23:56                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-15  9:50               ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-17  5:46                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-09-17  7:29                   ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-15 11:18               ` ACPI suspend: test 64-bit waking vector (was Re: [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector) Pavel Machek
2008-09-17  5:45                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-17  7:28                   ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-17 16:58                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-24  7:17               ` [PATCH] ACPI suspend: Always use the 32-bit waking vector Len Brown
2008-09-04  9:27   ` [PATCH]: ACPI : Set 32bit and 64bit waking vector in FCAS table Zhao Yakui
2008-09-04  9:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200809170746.43548.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox