From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PM: Simplify the new suspend/hibernation framework for devices
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:12:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081009171252.GC1370@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810062246.06654.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Mon 2008-10-06 22:46:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 6 of October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > I promised at the KS that I would simplify the new suspend/hibernation
> > framework for devices to avoid the confusion with two types of PM
> > operations and pointers to PM operations from too many places.
> >
> > The appended patch is intended for this purpose. Unfortunately, I can't
> > split it into subsystem-related patches, because compilation would be broken
> > between them.
> >
> > The patch applies to linux-next, but it's trivial to make it apply to the
> > mainline. It's been compiled on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and tested
> > on hp nx6325, doesn't appear to break anything.
>
> This one had a checkpatch.pl problem, sorry for that. Updated patch is
> appended.
Seems ok to me. ACK.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-09 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-05 22:55 [PATCH -next] PM: Simplify the new suspend/hibernation framework for devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-06 20:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-09 17:12 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-10-10 21:52 ` Greg KH
2008-10-10 22:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-10 22:43 ` Greg KH
2008-10-10 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-10 23:25 ` Greg KH
2008-10-10 23:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 4:43 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081009171252.GC1370@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox