From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH 2/3] Introduce acpi_root_table=rsdt boot param and dmi list to force rsdt Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:08:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20081021130836.GA28154@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200810192350.57993.trenn@suse.de> <200810211157.46134.trenn@suse.de> <20081021124604.GA27273@srcf.ucam.org> <200810211505.34657.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:55326 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751883AbYJUNIk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:08:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810211505.34657.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Len Brown , linux-acpi , Zhao Yakui , me@markdoughty.co.uk, linux-thinkpad , "devel@acpica.org" On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 03:05:33PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > Even if this is not proven, the patchset should still go in to get the > machines fixed for now and to easily test others, there was enough discussion > around it. What do you mean, "fixed"? They all already work, even if it's in a suboptimal way. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org