From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"stern@rowland.harvard.edu" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"david-b@pacbell.net" <david-b@pacbell.net>,
"dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net"
<dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] ACPI GPE based wakeup event detection
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:12:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810221412.19156.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022065101.GE15271@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Wednesday, 22 of October 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:39:47AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 11 of September 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > In ACPI platform, if native PME isn't enabled, GPE is used to report wakeup event.
> >
> > Add more details here, please.
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 9 ++++++
> > > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 15 +++++++++++
> > > drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 4 ++
> > > 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Index: linux/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2008-09-11 10:56:25.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2008-09-11 10:56:47.000000000 +0800
> > > @@ -45,6 +45,15 @@ config ACPI_SLEEP
> > > depends on PM_SLEEP
> > > default y
> > >
> > > +config ACPI_GPE_WAKEUP
> >
> > I'd call it ACPI_RUNTIME_WAKEUP
> ok
>
> > > +void unregister_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> > > +{
> > > + blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&acpi_bus_notify_list, nb);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_acpi_bus_notifier);
> > > +
> >
> > We were talking about removing the notifier last time. Please do that.
> Did you see my comments on the issue last time? ACPI test tree already introduces
> the mechanism for other purpose, and we can just use it.
>
> > > --- linux.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h 2008-09-11 10:56:25.000000000 +0800
> > > +++ linux/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h 2008-09-11 10:56:47.000000000 +0800
> > > @@ -327,6 +327,10 @@ int acpi_bus_get_private_data(acpi_handl
> > > extern int acpi_notifier_call_chain(struct acpi_device *, u32, u32);
> > > extern int register_acpi_notifier(struct notifier_block *);
> > > extern int unregister_acpi_notifier(struct notifier_block *);
> > > +
> > > +extern int register_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> > > +extern void unregister_acpi_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * External Functions
> > > */
> > >
> >
> > I understand from the above that devices having their own wake-up GPEs will be
> > handled. However, it still is completely unclear to me what happens with
> > devices that can generate PME# and for which there are no specific GPEs, like
> > any devices on add-in cards.
> As we discussed last time, pci bus for add-in cards will invoke a gpe, and
> this new implementation will check all pci devices under a bridge to try to find
> a device generating PME. This should work for add-in cards.
Well, can you please describe this mechanism to me or point me to
documents/code where I can read about it?
The question is how we can learn which GPE will be used for signalling the PME#
events.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-11 6:30 [RFC 0/5] device wakeup event support v2 Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 1/5] devcore introduce wakeup_event callback Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-19 19:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:23 ` Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 2/5] devcore adds generic wakeup event handler Shaohua Li
2008-09-11 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-10-19 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:24 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 3/5] pci wakeup handler Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:34 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 12:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 4/5] PCIe native PME detection Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 5:49 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-11 6:30 ` [RFC 5/5] ACPI GPE based wakeup event detection Shaohua Li
2008-10-19 20:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-22 6:51 ` Shaohua Li
2008-10-22 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-09-14 23:50 ` [RFC 0/5] device wakeup event support v2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-06 1:57 ` Shaohua Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-08 9:19 [RFC 0/5] device wakeup event support shaohua.li
2008-09-08 9:19 ` [RFC 5/5] ACPI GPE based wakeup event detection shaohua.li
2008-09-08 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-09 1:13 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-09-09 1:08 ` Li, Shaohua
2008-09-09 11:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-09 14:08 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810221412.19156.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox