From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 24 (ACPI) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:59:33 +0100 Message-ID: <200810261159.34620.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20081024171932.1e8131d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081025171606.f492a353.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081025171606.f492a353.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:19:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > linux-next-20081024/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c:505: error: 'acpi_target_sleep_state' undeclared (first use in this function) > linux-next-20081024/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c:576: error: 'acpi_target_sleep_state' undeclared (first use in this function) > make[4]: *** [drivers/acpi/sleep/main.o] Error 1 Yeah, there's a fix in the Len's tree: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git;a=commit;h=92daa7b53b76984565dfdfda5d9c679884121fb2 but Linus hasn't pulled it yet. Thanks, Rafael