From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 and 5 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:21:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20081102092104.GC10983@srcf.ucam.org> References: <490B3BB5.8060801@tuffmail.co.uk> <20081031171126.GA17313@srcf.ucam.org> <20081102034620.GA29606@khazad-dum.debian.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:37246 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753163AbYKBJVK (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 04:21:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081102034620.GA29606@khazad-dum.debian.net> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: Alan Jenkins , linux-kernel , linux acpi On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:46:20AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > When you don't use rfkill_set_default(). Which, if you are a platform > driver, and your platform can store state across power off, you should use. Ah, missed that. Yes, I'll fix that up. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org