From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use 32-bit FADT values on X86 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:14:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20081202011456.GA31706@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20081201111713.GA26069@srcf.ucam.org> <1228179913.2713.45.camel@rzhang-dt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:48522 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751742AbYLBBPA (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:15:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1228179913.2713.45.camel@rzhang-dt> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Zhang Rui Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:05:13AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 19:17 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > The ACPI specification says that we should use the 64-bit address offsets > > contained within the FADT if they exist. However, Windows uses the legacy > > address. > Including vista? According to the information I have, yes. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org