From: Zhenyu Wang <zhen78@gmail.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>,
"jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [intel/acpi] backlight - T61
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:14:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081203231455.GA11829@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228108103.2713.27.camel@rzhang-dt>
On 2008.12.01 13:08:23 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> >
> > However, testing FC10 with the latest upstream kernel,
> > including the i915 changes that appeared today...
> > it seems that GUI mode forgets the brighness when
> > I switch to console mode. Eg. If I use /sys or
> > hotkeys in GUI mode to reduce brightness to 0,
> > it stays dim when I switch to console mode,
> > but switches back to max brightness when
> > I switch back to GUI mode.
> hah, that's a done by X.
> ZhenYu pointed out that the graphics driver will set the backlight to
> maximum if it is 0 when switching to GUI.
> what if reducing the brightness to a lower but not 0 level?
> it should switch back to the original value, right?
> cc ZhenYU. :)
This depends on the backlight control method used by Xorg
video driver. We have this comment in the driver from Jesse I think,
/*
* If we're going from off->on we may need to turn on the backlight.
* We should use the saved value whenever possible, but on some
* machines 0 is a valid backlight value (due to an external backlight
* controller for example), so on them, when turning LVDS back on,
* they'll always re-maximize the brightness.
*/
if (!(INREG(PP_CONTROL) & POWER_TARGET_ON) &&
dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0)
dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle = dev_priv->backlight_max;
It looks if we're using kernel backlight method, '0' should be a human
sensible dim level instead of meaningless near-to-black level, right?
So how about this patch against current xf86-video-intel?
---
diff --git a/src/i830_lvds.c b/src/i830_lvds.c
index 239bc89..1799eab 100644
--- a/src/i830_lvds.c
+++ b/src/i830_lvds.c
@@ -400,7 +400,8 @@ i830SetLVDSPanelPower(xf86OutputPtr output, Bool on)
* they'll always re-maximize the brightness.
*/
if (!(INREG(PP_CONTROL) & POWER_TARGET_ON) &&
- dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0)
+ dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0 &&
+ pI830->backlight_control_method < BCM_KERNEL)
dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle = dev_priv->backlight_max;
OUTREG(PP_CONTROL, INREG(PP_CONTROL) | POWER_TARGET_ON);
---
p.s Len, if for intel graphics specific issue, we have another
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org for such discuss. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-03 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-28 6:47 [intel/acpi] backlight Yves-Alexis Perez
2008-11-28 19:18 ` [intel/acpi] backlight - T61 Len Brown
2008-11-28 22:38 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-11-28 22:50 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2008-12-01 1:32 ` Zhang Rui
2008-12-01 3:18 ` Len Brown
2008-12-01 5:08 ` Zhang Rui
2008-12-03 23:14 ` Zhenyu Wang [this message]
2008-12-04 2:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Zhenyu Wang
2008-12-09 21:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-12-01 1:08 ` [intel/acpi] backlight Zhao Yakui
2008-12-01 3:28 ` Len Brown
2008-12-01 8:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-01 19:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-12-01 19:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-01 11:11 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081203231455.GA11829@localdomain \
--to=zhen78@gmail.com \
--cc=corsac@debian.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox