public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhenyu Wang <zhen78@gmail.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>,
	Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>,
	"jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [intel/acpi] backlight - T61
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:14:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081203231455.GA11829@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228108103.2713.27.camel@rzhang-dt>

On 2008.12.01 13:08:23 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > 
> > However, testing FC10 with the latest upstream kernel,
> > including the i915 changes that appeared today...
> > it seems that GUI mode forgets the brighness when
> > I switch to console mode.  Eg. If I use /sys or
> > hotkeys in GUI mode to reduce brightness to 0,
> > it stays dim when I switch to console mode,
> > but switches back to max brightness when
> > I switch back to GUI mode.
> hah, that's a done by X.
> ZhenYu pointed out that the graphics driver will set the backlight to
> maximum if it is 0 when switching to GUI.
> what if reducing the brightness to a lower but not 0 level?
> it should switch back to the original value, right?
> cc ZhenYU. :)

This depends on the backlight control method used by Xorg
video driver. We have this comment in the driver from Jesse I think,

 /*
  * If we're going from off->on we may need to turn on the backlight.
  * We should use the saved value whenever possible, but on some
  * machines 0 is a valid backlight value (due to an external backlight
  * controller for example), so on them, when turning LVDS back on,
  * they'll always re-maximize the brightness.
  */
if (!(INREG(PP_CONTROL) & POWER_TARGET_ON) &&
	dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0)
	dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle = dev_priv->backlight_max;

It looks if we're using kernel backlight method, '0' should be a human
sensible dim level instead of meaningless near-to-black level, right?

So how about this patch against current xf86-video-intel?

---
diff --git a/src/i830_lvds.c b/src/i830_lvds.c
index 239bc89..1799eab 100644
--- a/src/i830_lvds.c
+++ b/src/i830_lvds.c
@@ -400,7 +400,8 @@ i830SetLVDSPanelPower(xf86OutputPtr output, Bool on)
 	 * they'll always re-maximize the brightness.
 	 */
 	if (!(INREG(PP_CONTROL) & POWER_TARGET_ON) &&
-	    dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0)
+	    dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0 &&
+	    pI830->backlight_control_method < BCM_KERNEL)
 	    dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle = dev_priv->backlight_max;
 
 	OUTREG(PP_CONTROL, INREG(PP_CONTROL) | POWER_TARGET_ON);
---

p.s Len, if for intel graphics specific issue, we have another
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org for such discuss. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-03 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-28  6:47 [intel/acpi] backlight Yves-Alexis Perez
2008-11-28 19:18 ` [intel/acpi] backlight - T61 Len Brown
2008-11-28 22:38   ` Thomas Renninger
2008-11-28 22:50   ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2008-12-01  1:32     ` Zhang Rui
2008-12-01  3:18       ` Len Brown
2008-12-01  5:08         ` Zhang Rui
2008-12-03 23:14           ` Zhenyu Wang [this message]
2008-12-04  2:50             ` [Intel-gfx] " Zhenyu Wang
2008-12-09 21:24             ` Jesse Barnes
2008-12-01  1:08 ` [intel/acpi] backlight Zhao Yakui
2008-12-01  3:28   ` Len Brown
2008-12-01  8:38     ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-01 19:27       ` Jesse Barnes
2008-12-01 19:32         ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-01 11:11   ` Yves-Alexis Perez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081203231455.GA11829@localdomain \
    --to=zhen78@gmail.com \
    --cc=corsac@debian.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox