public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>
To: Zhenyu Wang <zhen78@gmail.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [intel/acpi] backlight - T61
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:50:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204025014.GA18597@zhen-devel.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081203231455.GA11829@localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2448 bytes --]

On 2008.12.04 07:14:55 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > > However, testing FC10 with the latest upstream kernel,
> > > including the i915 changes that appeared today...
> > > it seems that GUI mode forgets the brighness when
> > > I switch to console mode.  Eg. If I use /sys or
> > > hotkeys in GUI mode to reduce brightness to 0,
> > > it stays dim when I switch to console mode,
> > > but switches back to max brightness when
> > > I switch back to GUI mode.
> > hah, that's a done by X.
> > ZhenYu pointed out that the graphics driver will set the backlight to
> > maximum if it is 0 when switching to GUI.
> > what if reducing the brightness to a lower but not 0 level?
> > it should switch back to the original value, right?
> > cc ZhenYU. :)
> 
> This depends on the backlight control method used by Xorg
> video driver. We have this comment in the driver from Jesse I think,
> 
>  /*
>   * If we're going from off->on we may need to turn on the backlight.
>   * We should use the saved value whenever possible, but on some
>   * machines 0 is a valid backlight value (due to an external backlight
>   * controller for example), so on them, when turning LVDS back on,
>   * they'll always re-maximize the brightness.
>   */
> if (!(INREG(PP_CONTROL) & POWER_TARGET_ON) &&
> 	dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0)
> 	dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle = dev_priv->backlight_max;
> 
> It looks if we're using kernel backlight method, '0' should be a human
> sensible dim level instead of meaningless near-to-black level, right?
> 
> So how about this patch against current xf86-video-intel?
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/src/i830_lvds.c b/src/i830_lvds.c
> index 239bc89..1799eab 100644
> --- a/src/i830_lvds.c
> +++ b/src/i830_lvds.c
> @@ -400,7 +400,8 @@ i830SetLVDSPanelPower(xf86OutputPtr output, Bool on)
>  	 * they'll always re-maximize the brightness.
>  	 */
>  	if (!(INREG(PP_CONTROL) & POWER_TARGET_ON) &&
> -	    dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0)
> +	    dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle == 0 &&
> +	    pI830->backlight_control_method < BCM_KERNEL)
>  	    dev_priv->backlight_duty_cycle = dev_priv->backlight_max;
>  
>  	OUTREG(PP_CONTROL, INREG(PP_CONTROL) | POWER_TARGET_ON);
> ---

I've tested this patch on T61 just fine. I push this to
xf86-video-intel master now.

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-04  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-28  6:47 [intel/acpi] backlight Yves-Alexis Perez
2008-11-28 19:18 ` [intel/acpi] backlight - T61 Len Brown
2008-11-28 22:38   ` Thomas Renninger
2008-11-28 22:50   ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2008-12-01  1:32     ` Zhang Rui
2008-12-01  3:18       ` Len Brown
2008-12-01  5:08         ` Zhang Rui
2008-12-03 23:14           ` Zhenyu Wang
2008-12-04  2:50             ` Zhenyu Wang [this message]
2008-12-09 21:24             ` Jesse Barnes
2008-12-01  1:08 ` [intel/acpi] backlight Zhao Yakui
2008-12-01  3:28   ` Len Brown
2008-12-01  8:38     ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-01 19:27       ` Jesse Barnes
2008-12-01 19:32         ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-01 11:11   ` Yves-Alexis Perez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081204025014.GA18597@zhen-devel.sh.intel.com \
    --to=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=corsac@debian.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhen78@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox