* Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related
[not found] ` <b637ec0b0811271354l58fc6039m941ca37fb9173d5b@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-12-05 0:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-05 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Comolli
Cc: Stefan Richter, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Jay Fenlason,
ACPI Devel Maling List, rui.zhang
(CCing to linux-acpi at Rui's request)
On Thursday, 27 of November 2008, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits
> >> applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest.
> >
> > Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits
> > in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7.
> >
> > I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if
> > the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly,
> >
> > By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems.
> >
>
> Reproduced with 2.6.27.7 with ec.c taken from 2.6.27.4 - after three
> minutes of freeze the laptop came back to normal as nothing had
> happened.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread