public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/20] ACPI: PCI: remove callback from acpi_pci_irq_lookup & acpi_pci_irq_derive
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:31:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081209043101.26415.6946.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081209042833.26415.24906.stgit@bob.kio>

We currently pass a callback function (either acpi_pci_allocate_irq() or
acpi_pci_free_irq()) to acpi_pci_irq_lookup() and acpi_pci_irq_derive().

I think it's simpler to remove the callback and just have the enable/
disable functions make the calls directly.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c |   93 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
index c8246c2..ef65c6d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
@@ -341,8 +341,6 @@ void acpi_pci_irq_del_prt(int segment, int bus)
 /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           PCI Interrupt Routing Support
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-typedef int (*irq_lookup_func) (struct acpi_prt_entry *, int *, int *, char **);
-
 static int
 acpi_pci_allocate_irq(struct acpi_prt_entry *entry,
 		      int *triggering, int *polarity, char **link)
@@ -370,8 +368,7 @@ acpi_pci_allocate_irq(struct acpi_prt_entry *entry,
 }
 
 static int
-acpi_pci_free_irq(struct acpi_prt_entry *entry,
-		  int *triggering, int *polarity, char **link)
+acpi_pci_free_irq(struct acpi_prt_entry *entry)
 {
 	int irq;
 
@@ -383,47 +380,29 @@ acpi_pci_free_irq(struct acpi_prt_entry *entry,
 	return irq;
 }
 
-/*
- * acpi_pci_irq_lookup
- * success: return IRQ >= 0
- * failure: return -1
- */
-static int
-acpi_pci_irq_lookup(struct pci_dev *dev, int pin,
-		    int *triggering,
-		    int *polarity, char **link, irq_lookup_func func)
+static struct acpi_prt_entry *
+acpi_pci_irq_lookup(struct pci_dev *dev, int pin)
 {
-	struct acpi_prt_entry *entry = NULL;
-	int ret;
-
+	struct acpi_prt_entry *entry;
 
 	entry = acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry(dev, pin);
 	if (!entry) {
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "No %s[%c] _PRT entry\n",
 				  pci_name(dev), pin_name(pin)));
-		return -1;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
 	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Found %s[%c] _PRT entry\n",
 			  pci_name(dev), pin_name(pin)));
 
-	ret = func(entry, triggering, polarity, link);
-	return ret;
+	return entry;
 }
 
-/*
- * acpi_pci_irq_derive
- * success: return IRQ >= 0
- * failure: return < 0
- */
-static int
-acpi_pci_irq_derive(struct pci_dev *dev,
-		    int pin,
-		    int *triggering,
-		    int *polarity, char **link, irq_lookup_func func)
+static struct acpi_prt_entry *
+acpi_pci_irq_derive(struct pci_dev *dev, int pin)
 {
+	struct acpi_prt_entry *entry = NULL;
 	struct pci_dev *bridge = dev;
-	int irq = -1;
 	u8 bridge_pin = 0, orig_pin = pin;
 
 
@@ -431,7 +410,7 @@ acpi_pci_irq_derive(struct pci_dev *dev,
 	 * Attempt to derive an IRQ for this device from a parent bridge's
 	 * PCI interrupt routing entry (eg. yenta bridge and add-in card bridge).
 	 */
-	while (irq < 0 && bridge->bus->self) {
+	while (!entry && bridge->bus->self) {
 		pin = (((pin - 1) + PCI_SLOT(bridge->devfn)) % 4) + 1;
 		bridge = bridge->bus->self;
 
@@ -442,26 +421,24 @@ acpi_pci_irq_derive(struct pci_dev *dev,
 				ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
 						  "No interrupt pin configured for device %s\n",
 						  pci_name(bridge)));
-				return -1;
+				return NULL;
 			}
 			pin = bridge_pin;
 		}
 
-		irq = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(bridge,
-					  pin, triggering, polarity,
-					  link, func);
+		entry = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(bridge, pin);
 	}
 
-	if (irq < 0) {
+	if (!entry) {
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "can't derive routing for PCI INT %c\n",
 			 pin_name(orig_pin));
-		return -1;
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Derived GSI %d for %s INT %c from %s\n",
-			  irq, pci_name(dev), pin_name(orig_pin), pci_name(bridge)));
+	ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Derived GSI for %s INT %c from %s\n",
+			  pci_name(dev), pin_name(orig_pin), pci_name(bridge)));
 
-	return irq;
+	return entry;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -472,6 +449,7 @@ acpi_pci_irq_derive(struct pci_dev *dev,
 
 int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
+	struct acpi_prt_entry *entry;
 	int gsi = 0;
 	u8 pin = 0;
 	int triggering = ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
@@ -493,18 +471,20 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	 * First we check the PCI IRQ routing table (PRT) for an IRQ.  PRT
 	 * values override any BIOS-assigned IRQs set during boot.
 	 */
-	gsi = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(dev, pin,
-				  &triggering, &polarity, &link,
-				  acpi_pci_allocate_irq);
+	entry = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(dev, pin);
 
 	/*
 	 * If no PRT entry was found, we'll try to derive an IRQ from the
 	 * device's parent bridge.
 	 */
-	if (gsi < 0)
-		gsi = acpi_pci_irq_derive(dev, pin, &triggering,
-					  &polarity, &link,
-					  acpi_pci_allocate_irq);
+	if (!entry)
+		entry = acpi_pci_irq_derive(dev, pin);
+
+	if (entry)
+		gsi = acpi_pci_allocate_irq(entry, &triggering, &polarity,
+					    &link);
+	else
+		gsi = -1;
 
 	if (gsi < 0) {
 		/*
@@ -561,10 +541,9 @@ void __attribute__ ((weak)) acpi_unregister_gsi(u32 i)
 
 void acpi_pci_irq_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
+	struct acpi_prt_entry *entry;
 	int gsi = 0;
 	u8 pin = 0;
-	int triggering = ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
-	int polarity = ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
 
 
 	pin = dev->pin;
@@ -574,20 +553,20 @@ void acpi_pci_irq_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	/*
 	 * First we check the PCI IRQ routing table (PRT) for an IRQ.
 	 */
-	gsi = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(dev, pin,
-				  &triggering, &polarity, NULL,
-				  acpi_pci_free_irq);
+	entry = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(dev, pin);
+
 	/*
 	 * If no PRT entry was found, we'll try to derive an IRQ from the
 	 * device's parent bridge.
 	 */
-	if (gsi < 0)
-		gsi = acpi_pci_irq_derive(dev, pin,
-					  &triggering, &polarity, NULL,
-					  acpi_pci_free_irq);
-	if (gsi < 0)
+	if (!entry)
+		entry = acpi_pci_irq_derive(dev, pin);
+
+	if (!entry)
 		return;
 
+	gsi = acpi_pci_free_irq(entry);
+
 	/*
 	 * TBD: It might be worth clearing dev->irq by magic constant
 	 * (e.g. PCI_UNDEFINED_IRQ).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-09  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-09  4:30 [PATCH 00/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify _PRT handling Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 01/20] ACPI: PCI: use conventional PCI address format Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 02/20] ACPI: PCI: remove unnecessary null pointer checks Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 03/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify buffer management for evaluating _PRT Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-31  4:15   ` [PATCH] ACPI: simplify buffer management for acpi_pci_bind() etc Len Brown
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 04/20] ACPI: PCI: ignore _PRT function information Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 05/20] ACPI: PCI: fix GSI/IRQ naming confusion Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 06/20] ACPI: PCI: move struct acpi_prt_entry declaration out of public header file Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 07/20] ACPI: PCI: add a helper to convert _PRT INTx pin number to name Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 08/20] ACPI: PCI: always use the PCI INTx pin values, not the _PRT ones Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 09/20] ACPI: PCI: use 1-based encoding for _PRT quirks Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 10/20] ACPI: PCI: lookup _PRT entry by PCI dev and pin, not segment/bus/dev/pin Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:30 ` [PATCH 11/20] ACPI: PCI: tweak _PRT lookup debug Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 13/20] ACPI: PCI: use positive logic to simplify code Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 14/20] ACPI: PCI: follow typical PCI INTx swizzling pattern Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 15/20] ACPI: PCI: combine lookup and derive Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 16/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify list of _PRT entries Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 17/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify struct acpi_prt_entry Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 18/20] ACPI: PCI: expand acpi_pci_allocate_irq() and acpi_pci_free_irq() inline Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 19/20] ACPI: PCI: whitespace and useless initialization cleanup Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 20/20] ACPI: PCI: add HP copyright Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-31  4:17 ` [PATCH 00/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify _PRT handling Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081209043101.26415.6946.stgit@bob.kio \
    --to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox