From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 16/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify list of _PRT entries
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:31:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081209043121.26415.41882.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081209042833.26415.24906.stgit@bob.kio>
We don't need a struct containing a count and a list_head; a simple
list_head is sufficient. The list iterators handle empty lists
fine.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 60 ++++++++++--------------------------------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
index 431d00b..b1cfd39 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("pci_irq");
struct acpi_prt_entry {
- struct list_head node;
+ struct list_head list;
struct acpi_pci_id id;
u8 pin;
struct {
@@ -54,12 +54,7 @@ struct acpi_prt_entry {
u32 irq;
};
-struct acpi_prt_list {
- int count;
- struct list_head entries;
-};
-
-static struct acpi_prt_list acpi_prt;
+static LIST_HEAD(acpi_prt_list);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acpi_prt_lock);
static inline char pin_name(int pin)
@@ -74,21 +69,13 @@ static inline char pin_name(int pin)
static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry(struct pci_dev *dev,
int pin)
{
- struct acpi_prt_entry *entry = NULL;
+ struct acpi_prt_entry *entry;
int segment = pci_domain_nr(dev->bus);
int bus = dev->bus->number;
int device = PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn);
- if (!acpi_prt.count)
- return NULL;
-
- /*
- * Parse through all PRT entries looking for a match on the specified
- * PCI device's segment, bus, device, and pin (don't care about func).
- *
- */
spin_lock(&acpi_prt_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(entry, &acpi_prt.entries, node) {
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &acpi_prt_list, list) {
if ((segment == entry->id.segment)
&& (bus == entry->id.bus)
&& (device == entry->id.device)
@@ -97,7 +84,6 @@ static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry(struct pci_dev *dev,
return entry;
}
}
-
spin_unlock(&acpi_prt_lock);
return NULL;
}
@@ -203,7 +189,7 @@ static int
acpi_pci_irq_add_entry(acpi_handle handle,
int segment, int bus, struct acpi_pci_routing_table *prt)
{
- struct acpi_prt_entry *entry = NULL;
+ struct acpi_prt_entry *entry;
entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_prt_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entry)
@@ -255,35 +241,17 @@ acpi_pci_irq_add_entry(acpi_handle handle,
prt->source, entry->link.index));
spin_lock(&acpi_prt_lock);
- list_add_tail(&entry->node, &acpi_prt.entries);
- acpi_prt.count++;
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, &acpi_prt_list);
spin_unlock(&acpi_prt_lock);
return 0;
}
-static void
-acpi_pci_irq_del_entry(int segment, int bus, struct acpi_prt_entry *entry)
-{
- if (segment == entry->id.segment && bus == entry->id.bus) {
- acpi_prt.count--;
- list_del(&entry->node);
- kfree(entry);
- }
-}
-
int acpi_pci_irq_add_prt(acpi_handle handle, int segment, int bus)
{
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
struct acpi_pci_routing_table *entry;
- static int first_time = 1;
-
- if (first_time) {
- acpi_prt.count = 0;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&acpi_prt.entries);
- first_time = 0;
- }
/* 'handle' is the _PRT's parent (root bridge or PCI-PCI bridge) */
status = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
@@ -319,21 +287,17 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_add_prt(acpi_handle handle, int segment, int bus)
void acpi_pci_irq_del_prt(int segment, int bus)
{
- struct list_head *node = NULL, *n = NULL;
- struct acpi_prt_entry *entry = NULL;
-
- if (!acpi_prt.count) {
- return;
- }
+ struct acpi_prt_entry *entry, *tmp;
printk(KERN_DEBUG
"ACPI: Delete PCI Interrupt Routing Table for %04x:%02x\n",
segment, bus);
spin_lock(&acpi_prt_lock);
- list_for_each_safe(node, n, &acpi_prt.entries) {
- entry = list_entry(node, struct acpi_prt_entry, node);
-
- acpi_pci_irq_del_entry(segment, bus, entry);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &acpi_prt_list, list) {
+ if (segment == entry->id.segment && bus == entry->id.bus) {
+ list_del(&entry->list);
+ kfree(entry);
+ }
}
spin_unlock(&acpi_prt_lock);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-09 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-09 4:30 [PATCH 00/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify _PRT handling Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 01/20] ACPI: PCI: use conventional PCI address format Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 02/20] ACPI: PCI: remove unnecessary null pointer checks Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 03/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify buffer management for evaluating _PRT Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-31 4:15 ` [PATCH] ACPI: simplify buffer management for acpi_pci_bind() etc Len Brown
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 04/20] ACPI: PCI: ignore _PRT function information Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 05/20] ACPI: PCI: fix GSI/IRQ naming confusion Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 06/20] ACPI: PCI: move struct acpi_prt_entry declaration out of public header file Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 07/20] ACPI: PCI: add a helper to convert _PRT INTx pin number to name Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 08/20] ACPI: PCI: always use the PCI INTx pin values, not the _PRT ones Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 09/20] ACPI: PCI: use 1-based encoding for _PRT quirks Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 10/20] ACPI: PCI: lookup _PRT entry by PCI dev and pin, not segment/bus/dev/pin Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:30 ` [PATCH 11/20] ACPI: PCI: tweak _PRT lookup debug Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 12/20] ACPI: PCI: remove callback from acpi_pci_irq_lookup & acpi_pci_irq_derive Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 13/20] ACPI: PCI: use positive logic to simplify code Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 14/20] ACPI: PCI: follow typical PCI INTx swizzling pattern Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 15/20] ACPI: PCI: combine lookup and derive Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 17/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify struct acpi_prt_entry Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 18/20] ACPI: PCI: expand acpi_pci_allocate_irq() and acpi_pci_free_irq() inline Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 19/20] ACPI: PCI: whitespace and useless initialization cleanup Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09 4:31 ` [PATCH 20/20] ACPI: PCI: add HP copyright Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-31 4:17 ` [PATCH 00/20] ACPI: PCI: simplify _PRT handling Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081209043121.26415.41882.stgit@bob.kio \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox