From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:53:48 +0100 Message-ID: <200812110053.49012.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20081210164659.9ebb8158.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081210145226.8a174e68.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081210145226.8a174e68.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 10 of December 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:46:59 +1100 > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git > > (patches at > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/) > > This tree breaks poweroff on my x86_64 test box. `halt -pfn' does all > the usual things, but the machine doesn't turn off. > > config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt > dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-akpm2.txt > > Any suggestions which don't include the word "bisect" would be most welcome. Did you suspend-resume the box before that?