From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: state of some x86 acpi patches Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:25:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20081216192534.GB843@elte.hu> References: <4947FF4C.80706@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49421 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753181AbYLPTZr (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:25:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4947FF4C.80706@goop.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: "Brown, Len" , Yinghai Lu , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Hi Len, > > Have you seen these three patches? Do they look OK to you? > > Yinghai Lu improve the third patch ("acpi: remove final __acpi_map_table > mapping before setting acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap"), which I think Ingo > sent you instead. Len, i asked about these patches before too - and if that's fine with you we'd just queue them up in the x86 tree (like we did before the .28 merge window). Most of the impact will be on x86. So an Acked-by from you would be fine to start this. Ingo