From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] pm: device parallel resume mechanism
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:15:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812191815.11153.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229668448.562.88.camel@rzhang-dt>
On Friday, 19 of December 2008, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> The resume process can be split into 3 parts, BIOS resume time, kernel
> resume time and X/application resume time.
> And device resume takes most of the kernel resume time.
> this patch set introduces a new mechanism to resume device in parallel
> which can reduce the device resume time a lot.
>
> In this proposal, some devices can create its own workqueue for
> parallel resume. And for all the other devices that depends on this
> device, their resume methods are queued in the same workqueue.
> And we flush all the workqueues before resuming X/applications.
>
> As the devices vary from different platforms. it's hard to give an exact
> number of how much time it can reduce.
> Here are some of my test results:
> 1. eeepc901, kernel resume time can be reduced from about 2.1 seconds to
> 1.6 seconds.
> 2. a SantaRosa testbox, kernel resume time can be reduced from about
> 3.5s to 2s.
>
> please review this patch. Any comments are welcome. :)
Well, given that our single-thread resume is not exactly correct, I think
it's _way_ to early to indroduce things like this.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-19 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-19 6:34 [RFC PATCH 0/3] pm: device parallel resume mechanism Zhang Rui
2008-12-19 17:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-12-22 3:12 ` Zhang Rui
2008-12-22 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812191815.11153.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox