2.6.28-rc9 regression: system fails to suspend

2.6.28-rc9 regression: system fails to suspend

[Andrey Borzenkov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]

I will bisect as time permits, but may be it rings the bell for someone. 
2.6.28-rc7 is OK; rc9 switches console off and never goes in suspend. 
Power remains on, keyboard is non-functional and the only way out is 
power button. I have not tried rc8.

If somebody has soggestions what to (try to) revert, it would be great 
and save quite a bit of time for bisecting.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: 2.6.28-rc9 regression: system fails to suspend

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, 22 of December 2008, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> I will bisect as time permits, but may be it rings the bell for someone. 
> 2.6.28-rc7 is OK; rc9 switches console off and never goes in suspend. 
> Power remains on, keyboard is non-functional and the only way out is 
> power button. I have not tried rc8.
> 
> If somebody has soggestions what to (try to) revert, it would be great 
> and save quite a bit of time for bisecting.

You can have a look at the list of regressions at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=11808
find the fixes applied between .28-rc7 and .28-rc9 and check those commits.

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: 2.6.28-rc9 regression: system fails to suspend

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:

> I will bisect as time permits, but may be it rings the bell for someone. 
> 2.6.28-rc7 is OK; rc9 switches console off and never goes in suspend. 
> Power remains on, keyboard is non-functional and the only way out is 
> power button. I have not tried rc8.
> 
> If somebody has soggestions what to (try to) revert, it would be great 
> and save quite a bit of time for bisecting.

Can you please provide detailed information about the machine which
exposes this problem ?

Thanks,

	tglx