From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:53:00 -0800 Message-ID: <20090105025300.3afbec23@infradead.org> References: <20090104092430.7ffd2c41@infradead.org> <1231135294.8179.45.camel@nigel-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1231135294.8179.45.camel@nigel-laptop> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: ncunningham-lkml@crca.org.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:01:34 +1100 Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi Arjan. > > Great work, and valuable too. I'm just wondering if the header file > name "async.h" is a little too generic? Something like async_init.h > perhaps? > while the users I have in mind are during init, the concept and infrastructure of asynchronous function calls is by no means limited to that use case... I hope there are many other uses for this :) -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org