From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFC: ACPI: Set enforce_resources to strict if a ATK0110 device is found in namespace
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090202202907.GA9223@dreamland.darkstar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902021822.20237.trenn@suse.de>
Il Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Thomas Renninger ha scritto:
> On Monday 02 February 2009 12:38:24 you wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:22:43 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > >> @@ -1063,7 +1063,10 @@ __setup("acpi_wake_gpes_always_on",
> > >> acpi_wake_gpes_always_on_setup); * in arbitrary AML code and can
> > >> interfere with legacy drivers. * acpi_enforce_resources= can be set to:
> > >> *
> > >> - * - strict (2)
> > >> + * - auto (2)
> > >> + * -> detect possible conflicts with ACPI drivers and switch to
> > >> + * strict if needed, otherwise act like lax
> > >> + * - strict (3)
> > >> * -> further driver trying to access the resources will not load
> > >> * - lax (default) (1)
> > >> * -> further driver trying to access the resources will load, but
> > >> you @@ -1073,11 +1076,12 @@ __setup("acpi_wake_gpes_always_on",
> > >> acpi_wake_gpes_always_on_setup); * -> ACPI Operation Region
> > >> resources will not be registered *
> > >> */
> > >> -#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT 2
> > >> +#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT 3
> > >> +#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO 2
> > >> #define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX 1
> > >> #define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_NO 0
> > >
> > > I don't see any reason to change ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT from 2 to 3.
> > > Just add ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO as 3 and that's it, makes your patch
> > > smaller.
> >
> > There's an unspoken reason ;-) The options are ordered by
> > "strictness", I was experimenting with an API to export the parameter,
> > in order to move the code to a separate quirk file. Since it's not
> > relevant in this patch I'll back out the change.
>
> And the other one, implementing the ATK0110 quirk.
> The same probably could be easy done now with video_detect.c.
> The video device HID should get added in scan.c again as suggested by Bjorn.
> Then the video_detect.c can go into quirks.c and get deleted.
>
> What do you think?
Well mostly ACK, modulo DMI comment in my other email.
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 6729a49..92e4226 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
[...]
> -static unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX;
> +unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_AUTO;
>
> static int __init acpi_enforce_resources_setup(char *str)
> {
You're missing the code to parse "auto" here.
I also have this patch from a previous email:
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
index d8362cf..10fd2d7 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -258,6 +258,25 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
to assume that this machine's pmtimer latches its value
and always returns good values.
+ acpi_enforce_resources= [ACPI]
+ { strict, auto, lax, no }
+ Check for resource conflicts between native drivers
+ and ACPI OperationRegions (SystemIO and SystemMemory
+ only). IO ports and memory declared in ACPI might be
+ used by the ACPI subsystem in arbitrary AML code and
+ can interfere with legacy drivers.
+ strict: access to resources claimed by ACPI is denied;
+ legacy drivers trying to access reserved resources
+ will fail to load.
+ auto (default): try and detect ACPI devices with known
+ ACPI drivers; escalates the setting to "strict" if such
+ a device is found, otherwise behaves like "lax".
+ lax: access to resources claimed by ACPI is allowed;
+ legacy drivers trying to access reserved resources
+ will load and a warning message is logged.
+ no: ACPI OperationRegions are not marked as reserved,
+ no further checks are performed.
+
agp= [AGP]
{ off | try_unsupported }
off: disable AGP support
Luca
--
"L'amore consiste nell'essere cretini insieme." -- P. Valery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-02 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-25 21:05 [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-26 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 10:30 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 15:16 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-29 16:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 18:58 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 21:31 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-30 14:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-01 21:22 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 9:11 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-02 11:38 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] RFC: ACPI: Interface for ACPI drivers to place quirk code which gets executed early Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:22 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 13:08 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 13:45 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 14:19 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 13:37 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] RFC: ACPI: Set enforce_resources to strict if a ATK0110 device is found in namespace Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:29 ` Luca Tettamanti [this message]
2009-02-02 11:38 ` [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 21:15 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-04 5:52 ` Len Brown
2009-02-04 6:05 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-04 13:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 13:26 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 14:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 13:57 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-10 14:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 15:32 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-10 16:24 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-27 13:27 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-24 12:39 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-24 13:21 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-24 13:43 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-24 14:29 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-29 20:16 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-29 20:33 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-29 20:55 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-29 22:01 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-30 7:36 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:59 ` Len Brown
2009-04-03 9:40 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-12 12:44 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:45 ` polling (Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources) Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090202202907.GA9223@dreamland.darkstar.lan \
--to=kronos.it@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox