public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable bit 11 in _PDC to advertise hw coord
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:57:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204085712.GF30821@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090202195717.GA24510@linux-os.sc.intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 02 2009, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> 
> Bit 11 in intel PDC definitions is meant for OS capability to handle
> hardware coordination of P-states. In Linux we have always supported
> hwardware coordination of P-states. Just let the BIOSes know that we
> support it, by setting this bit.
> 
> Some BIOSes use this bit to choose between hardware or software coordination
> and without this change below, BIOSes switch to software coordination, which
> is not very optimal in terms of power consumption and extra wakeups from idle.

I can confirm that this fixes the excessive reschedule ipi count on an
x60 with the ondemand governor. Can we please get this into 2.6.29?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> 
> ---
>  include/acpi/pdc_intel.h |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h	2009-01-20 16:11:20.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h	2009-02-02 10:32:06.000000000 -0800
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #define ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD		(0x0080)
>  #define ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH		(0x0100)
>  #define ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH		(0x0200)
> +#define ACPI_PDC_SMP_P_HWCOORD		(0x0800)
>  
>  #define ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP	(ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_C_C1_HALT | \
> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
>  #define ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP	(ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_C_C1_HALT | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_SMP_P_SWCOORD | \
> +					 ACPI_PDC_SMP_P_HWCOORD | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_P_FFH)
>  
>  #define ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP	(ACPI_PDC_SMP_C2C3  | \

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-04  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-02 19:57 [PATCH] Enable bit 11 in _PDC to advertise hw coord Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-04  8:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-02-04 19:53   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-02-04 20:06     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-04 20:40       ` Greg KH
2009-02-08 19:51         ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-02-07  4:10 ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090204085712.GF30821@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox