From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: ACPI hotplug panic with current git head Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:30:03 -0800 Message-ID: <200902131630.04858.jesse.barnes@intel.com> References: <1231604250.3642.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <497D1BD7.9000609@jp.fujitsu.com> <498045D1.60005@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <498045D1.60005@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kenji Kaneshige Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , James Bottomley , Len Brown , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel , "Li, Shaohua" , Grant Grundler List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:47 am Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > I made several patches to fix the wrong assumption described > above. It is very difficult for me to check all the code that > refers pci_bus->self. So I checked include/linux/pci-acpi.h and > the code under drivers/pci/ only. And I made patches for the code > like below: > > - The code that clearly chooses host bridge operation or > PCI-to-PCI bridge operation based on pci_bus->self. > > - The code that might cause endless loop if pci_bus->self is > not NULL on the PCI root bus. Kenji-san, can you re-send these to my private mail so I can apply them? (Outlook/Exchange can't let plain text through without molesting it for some reason.) Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center