From: venkip@linux-os.sc.intel.com
To: lenb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:53:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090220005517.671823000@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090220005352.674253000@linux-os.sc.intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: rename_aperf_mperf.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3486 bytes --]
Change structure name to make the code look simpler. No functionality
change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 44 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-02-04 16:03:20.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c 2009-02-04 16:05:42.000000000 -0800
@@ -238,24 +238,24 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpum
return cmd.val;
}
-struct perf_cur {
+struct perf_pair {
union {
struct {
u32 lo;
u32 hi;
} split;
u64 whole;
- } aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
+ } aperf, mperf;
};
/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
{
- struct perf_cur *cur = _cur;
+ struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi);
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi);
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void
static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct perf_cur cur;
+ struct perf_pair cur;
unsigned int perf_percent;
unsigned int retval;
@@ -290,39 +290,39 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
* Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
* an approximate value.
*/
- if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) {
+ if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
int shift_count;
u32 h;
- h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi);
+ h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
shift_count = fls(h);
- cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
}
- if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) {
+ if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
int shift_count = 7;
- cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
}
- if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo)
- perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) /
- cur.mperf_cur.split.lo;
+ if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
+ perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) /
+ cur.mperf.split.lo;
else
perf_percent = 0;
#else
- if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) {
+ if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
int shift_count = 7;
- cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
}
- if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole)
- perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) /
- cur.mperf_cur.whole;
+ if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
+ perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) /
+ cur.mperf.whole;
else
perf_percent = 0;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-20 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-20 0:53 [patch 0/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: Make APERF MPERF read only in acpi_cpufreq venkip
2009-02-20 0:53 ` venkip [this message]
2009-03-17 6:02 ` [patch 1/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: cleanup structure names related to aperf mperf Len Brown
2009-02-20 0:53 ` [patch 2/2] x86, acpi_cpufreq: do not clear aperf mperf MSR after read venkip
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090220005517.671823000@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=venkip@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox