* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
[not found] <871vtpqex0.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org>
@ 2009-02-23 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heinz Diehl
Cc: linux-kernel, Alexey Starikovskiy, ACPI Devel Maling List,
Len Brown, Moore, Robert
On Monday 23 February 2009, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> booting 2.6.29-rc6 shows the following in boot.log:
>
> [....]
> <7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff]
> <6>ACPI: bus type pci registered
> <5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127
> <5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820
> <6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff
> <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
> <4>bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0
> <7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
> --> <3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR)
> --> <4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204]
> <6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled
> <6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5)
> <6>ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
> <6>ACPI: No dock devices found.
> <6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
> <7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f]
> [....]
Well, this looks like a result of some recent ACPICA changes. ACPI people
CCed.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
[not found] <871vtpqex0.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org>
2009-02-23 21:25 ` ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown
2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-02-23 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heinz Diehl; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-acpi
(cc linux-acpi)
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:46:51 +0100
Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> booting 2.6.29-rc6 shows the following in boot.log:
>
> [....]
> <7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff]
> <6>ACPI: bus type pci registered
> <5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127
> <5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820
> <6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff
> <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
> <4>bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0
> <7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
> --> <3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR)
> --> <4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204]
> <6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled
> <6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5)
> <6>ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
> <6>ACPI: No dock devices found.
> <6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
> <7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f]
> [....]
>
> ...while 2.6.28.7 boots without showing any ACPI exception:
>
> [....]
> <7>bus: 00 index 3 mmio: [d0000000, efffffff]
> <7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff]
> <6>ACPI: bus type pci registered
> <5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127
> <5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820
> <6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff
> <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
> <7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
> <6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled
> <6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5)
> <6>ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
> <6>ACPI: No dock devices found.
> <6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
> <7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f]
> [....]
Are there any observeable effects from this apart from the scary
message?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown
2009-02-24 15:01 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-02-24 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Heinz Diehl, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
> > --> <3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR)
> > --> <4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204]
Heinz,
Thanks for the note.
Please attach the output of acpidump here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Also, if this system has both pic and IOAPIC mode,
it would be interesting to try booting it in both,
eg with "noapic".
thanks,
-Len
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown
@ 2009-02-24 15:01 ` Heinz Diehl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heinz Diehl @ 2009-02-24 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
On 24.02.2009, Len Brown wrote:
> Please attach the output of acpidump here:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Did just upload the attachment.
> Also, if this system has both pic and IOAPIC mode,
> it would be interesting to try booting it in both,
> eg with "noapic".
Booting with the "noapic" option, the logfile shows:
[....]
<7>bus: 00 index 3 mmio: [d0000000, efffffff]
<7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff]
<6>ACPI: bus type pci registered
<5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127
<5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820
<6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff
<6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
<4>bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0
<7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
<3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR)
<4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204]
<6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled
<6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5)
<6>ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
<6>ACPI: No dock devices found.
<6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
<7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f]
[....]
Greetings,
Heinz.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown
@ 2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heinz Diehl @ 2009-02-24 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-acpi
On 24.02.2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Are there any observeable effects from this apart from the scary
> message?
The machine is up for 1.5 hours now, did not see any problems so far.
Greetings,
Heinz.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-24 14:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <871vtpqex0.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org>
2009-02-23 21:25 ` ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown
2009-02-24 15:01 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox