* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 [not found] <871vtpqex0.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org> @ 2009-02-23 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heinz Diehl Cc: linux-kernel, Alexey Starikovskiy, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown, Moore, Robert On Monday 23 February 2009, Heinz Diehl wrote: > Hi, > > booting 2.6.29-rc6 shows the following in boot.log: > > [....] > <7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff] > <6>ACPI: bus type pci registered > <5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127 > <5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820 > <6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff > <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access > <4>bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 > <7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT > --> <3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR) > --> <4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204] > <6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled > <6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5) > <6>ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing > <6>ACPI: No dock devices found. > <6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) > <7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f] > [....] Well, this looks like a result of some recent ACPICA changes. ACPI people CCed. Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 [not found] <871vtpqex0.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org> 2009-02-23 21:25 ` ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton 2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown 2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl 1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-02-23 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heinz Diehl; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-acpi (cc linux-acpi) On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:46:51 +0100 Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> wrote: > Hi, > > booting 2.6.29-rc6 shows the following in boot.log: > > [....] > <7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff] > <6>ACPI: bus type pci registered > <5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127 > <5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820 > <6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff > <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access > <4>bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 > <7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT > --> <3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR) > --> <4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204] > <6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled > <6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5) > <6>ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing > <6>ACPI: No dock devices found. > <6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) > <7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f] > [....] > > ...while 2.6.28.7 boots without showing any ACPI exception: > > [....] > <7>bus: 00 index 3 mmio: [d0000000, efffffff] > <7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff] > <6>ACPI: bus type pci registered > <5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127 > <5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820 > <6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff > <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access > <7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT > <6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled > <6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5) > <6>ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing > <6>ACPI: No dock devices found. > <6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) > <7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f] > [....] Are there any observeable effects from this apart from the scary message? Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton @ 2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown 2009-02-24 15:01 ` Heinz Diehl 2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Len Brown @ 2009-02-24 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Heinz Diehl, linux-kernel, linux-acpi > > --> <3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR) > > --> <4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204] Heinz, Thanks for the note. Please attach the output of acpidump here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758 Also, if this system has both pic and IOAPIC mode, it would be interesting to try booting it in both, eg with "noapic". thanks, -Len ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown @ 2009-02-24 15:01 ` Heinz Diehl 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Heinz Diehl @ 2009-02-24 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Len Brown; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-acpi On 24.02.2009, Len Brown wrote: > Please attach the output of acpidump here: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758 Did just upload the attachment. > Also, if this system has both pic and IOAPIC mode, > it would be interesting to try booting it in both, > eg with "noapic". Booting with the "noapic" option, the logfile shows: [....] <7>bus: 00 index 3 mmio: [d0000000, efffffff] <7>bus: 00 index 4 mmio: [230000000, fcffffffff] <6>ACPI: bus type pci registered <5>PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 127 <5>PCI: MCFG area at f0000000 reserved in E820 <6>PCI: Using MMCONFIG at f0000000 - f7ffffff <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access <4>bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0 <7>ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT <3>ACPI: Denied BIOS AML access to invalid port 0x4d0+0x2 (ELCR) <4>ACPI Exception (dsopcode-0419): AE_AML_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS, During address validation of OpRegion [ELCR] [20081204] <6>ACPI: Interpreter enabled <6>ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5) <6>ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing <6>ACPI: No dock devices found. <6>ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00) <7>pci 0000:00:01.1: reg 10 io port: [0xe800-0xe83f] [....] Greetings, Heinz. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton 2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown @ 2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Heinz Diehl @ 2009-02-24 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-acpi On 24.02.2009, Andrew Morton wrote: > Are there any observeable effects from this apart from the scary > message? The machine is up for 1.5 hours now, did not see any problems so far. Greetings, Heinz. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-24 14:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <871vtpqex0.wl%htd@fancy-poultry.org>
2009-02-23 21:25 ` ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-24 2:30 ` Len Brown
2009-02-24 15:01 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-02-24 15:03 ` Heinz Diehl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox