From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] ACPI video: support reversed _BCL method Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:11:36 +0000 Message-ID: <20090310171136.GD2527@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1236672211.2820.122.camel@rzhang-dt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:49593 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756342AbZCJRLk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:11:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1236672211.2820.122.camel@rzhang-dt> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Zhang Rui Cc: linux-acpi , Len Brown , Thomas Renninger On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 04:03:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > sort the _BCL packge in case it's reversed. What code actually uses this? A later patch seems to check it in the indexed case, but I can't find a reference to using it in the non-indexed case. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org