Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop: support rfkill via ACPI interfaces

Mattia Dongili
2009-03-22T02:38:48Z

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:10:37PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 02:55:02PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > 0x33: 0x34: 0x36: 0x37:
> > 0, 0x0101 0x0101 0x0101 0x0101
> > 1, 0x0102 0x0102 0x0102 0x0102
> > 2, 0x0100 0x0100 0x0100 0x0100
> > 3, 0x0104 0x0104
> > 4, 0x0107 0x010F 0x0107 0x010F
> > 5, 0x0106 0x0106
> > 6, 0x0000 0x0113
> > 7, 0x0111 0x010A
> > C, 0x010C
> > D, 0x010D 0x010D
> > E, 0x0105 0x0105 0x0105 0x0105
> > F, 0x0103 0x0103 0x0103
>
> Actually slightly more complicated than that - some are only stored on
> certain OS versions. Here's a more complete table.
>
> 0x33: 0x34: 0x36: 0x37:
>
> 0, 0x0101 0x0101 0x0101 0x0101
> 1, 0x0102 0x0102 0x0102 0x0102
> 2, 0x0100 0x0100 0x0100 0x0100
> 3, 0x0104 0x0113 0x0104
> 4, 0x0107 0x010F 0x0107 0x010F
> 5, 0x0106 0x0106
> 6, 0x0113 0x0113
> 7, 0x0111 0x010A
> C, 0x010C
> D, 0x010D 0x010D
> E, 0x0105 0x0105 0x0105 0x0105
> F, 0x0103 0x0103 0x0103
>
> The way that 0x113 moves around leaves me pretty sure that calling SN07
> without checking what the function signature is is not a good idea. I'll
> rewrite my patch.

Ok no rush, I'll wait until you're done before submitting the batch for
.30.

PS: you forgot the type P DSDT attachment. ;)
--
mattia
:wq!