From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>,
Matthias Welwarsky <matze@welwarsky.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop: support rfkill via ACPI interfaces
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090323000853.GA31671@kamineko.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090322231449.GA14166@srcf.ucam.org>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:14:49PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:10:30AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:46:52PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Ok, sounds like the mapping needs to be changed. Can you let me know
> > > which ACPI events are generated for each key?
> >
> > Yes it does.
> > A vaio SR user sent me this list for 0x9c that after a call to SN07(202)
> > becomes:
>
> 0x9c as well? Interesting. Easy enough to generalise that code, I guess.
well, I was thinking of a two layer lookup keyed on the event code
(0x9[02ce]).
> If we don't have a match, maybe we should just send the scancode with
> KEY_UNKNOWN and let hal remap them?
the problem is that the decoded keypress (after the SN07 call) generates
duplicates, i.e.: 0x81 is fn+f1 for the 0x92 case and some "Mode" key
for 0x9c the an SR model.
I guess sending the whole combination as the scancode would do the trick
(0x9c81).
But as long as we can make it consistent with what sony-laptop currently
sends to userspace then we should try to have a map.
--
mattia
:wq!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-23 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 21:21 [PATCH] sony-laptop: support rfkill via ACPI interfaces Matthew Garrett
2009-03-19 21:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-19 21:34 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-19 21:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-19 21:49 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-19 21:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-19 22:15 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-20 0:28 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-20 0:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-20 0:40 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-20 1:18 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-20 7:33 ` Matthias Welwarsky
2009-03-21 11:22 ` Matthias Welwarsky
2009-03-21 13:53 ` Matthias Welwarsky
2009-03-21 14:45 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-21 16:51 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-22 17:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-22 18:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-22 20:36 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-22 20:37 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-22 22:06 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-22 22:46 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-22 23:10 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-22 23:14 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 0:08 ` Mattia Dongili [this message]
2009-03-23 0:10 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 12:30 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 13:04 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-23 15:32 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 15:43 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 16:00 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 16:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 16:27 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 16:30 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 16:37 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 16:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 16:41 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 16:51 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 17:48 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 19:51 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-24 0:01 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-24 0:08 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-23 21:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-24 0:02 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-24 0:04 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-23 12:29 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-23 14:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-21 16:18 ` Norbert Preining
2009-03-20 8:52 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-20 14:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-21 4:00 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-21 4:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-21 6:32 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-21 14:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-21 14:37 ` Mattia Dongili
2009-03-21 14:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-21 15:10 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-21 19:15 ` Matthias Welwarsky
2009-03-22 13:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-03-22 2:38 ` Mattia Dongili
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090323000853.GA31671@kamineko.org \
--to=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matze@welwarsky.de \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=preining@logic.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox