From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paravirtualizing bits of acpi access Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:52:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20090323195227.GB30693@srcf.ucam.org> References: <49C484B7.20100@goop.org> <49C67054.7020603@goop.org> <0A882F4D99BBF6449D58E61AAFD7EDD60E5E8766@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <200903231920.12991.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:41692 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755133AbZCWT6t (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:58:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903231920.12991.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , 'Jeremy Fitzhardinge' , "Brown, Len" , Xen-devel , the arch/x86 maintainers , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "Cihula, Joseph" On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 07:20:12PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 23 March 2009, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > And then Xen jumps in to finish remaining steps. From this angle, > > Xen is not a completely new platform and, well, S3 is more like a > > 'S1' type from dom0's p.o.v with a different trigger method. Then is > > it overkilled to introduce a new set of ops with 99% content > > duplicated? > > IMO, no, it isn't. I'd disagree. Duplicating the code means remembering to apply bugfixes to both parts. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org