From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] ACPI: call acpi_debug_init() explicitly rather than as initcall
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:15:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903241715.53690.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440903241608q65dd0d94i794dbbef7bf7d586@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 05:08:12 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:
> > This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_debug_init() directly.
> > Previously, both were subsys_initcalls. acpi_debug_init()
> > must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it
> > explicitly rather than rely on link ordering.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 1 +
> > drivers/acpi/debug.c | 14 ++++++--------
> > drivers/acpi/internal.h | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > index c133072..f32cfd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > @@ -883,6 +883,7 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void)
> > acpi_ec_init();
> > acpi_power_init();
> > acpi_system_init();
> > + acpi_debug_init();
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/debug.c b/drivers/acpi/debug.c
> > index 20223cb..9cb189f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/debug.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/debug.c
> > @@ -297,17 +297,15 @@ acpi_system_write_debug(struct file *file,
> >
> > return count;
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > -static int __init acpi_debug_init(void)
> > +int __init acpi_debug_init(void)
> > {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS
> > struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> > int error = 0;
> > char *name;
> >
> > -
> > - if (acpi_disabled)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > /* 'debug_layer' [R/W] */
> > name = ACPI_SYSTEM_FILE_DEBUG_LAYER;
> > entry =
> > @@ -338,7 +336,7 @@ static int __init acpi_debug_init(void)
> > remove_proc_entry(ACPI_SYSTEM_FILE_DEBUG_LAYER, acpi_root_dir);
> > error = -ENODEV;
> > goto Done;
> > -}
> > -
> > -subsys_initcall(acpi_debug_init);
> > +#else
> > + return 0;
> > #endif
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > index 4a35f6e..44b8402 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,12 @@
> > int acpi_scan_init(void);
> > int acpi_system_init(void);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG
>
> ==> #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS)
I could do that, and leave the #ifdefs in debug.c as they were,
but I thought it was cleaner to make it so that if we compile debug.c
(i.e., CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y), it always provides acpi_debug_init().
I moved the #ifdefs in debug.c so that acpi_debug_init() is a no-op
if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=n.
So I think my patch already addressed your concern, but let me
know if not.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 22:49 [PATCH 00/10] ACPI: remove several initcalls Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] ACPI: skip DMI power state check when ACPI disabled Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] ACPI: call acpi_scan_init() explicitly rather than as initcall Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] ACPI: call acpi_ec_init() " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] ACPI: call acpi_power_init() " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] ACPI: call acpi_system_init() " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:50 ` [PATCH 06/10] ACPI: call acpi_debug_init() " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 23:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 23:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2009-03-24 23:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-25 14:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-25 19:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-25 22:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:50 ` [PATCH 07/10] ACPI: call init_acpi_device_notify() " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:50 ` [PATCH 08/10] ACPI: call acpi_sleep_proc_init() " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] ACPI: call acpi_wakeup_device_init() " Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-24 22:50 ` [PATCH 10/10] ACPI: tidy up makefile Bjorn Helgaas
2009-03-27 16:57 ` [PATCH 00/10] ACPI: remove several initcalls Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903241715.53690.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox