public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:33:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090329203321.GA31857@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090329201617.GA10303@dreamland.darkstar.lan>

On Sun 2009-03-29 22:16:17, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:21:21PM +0100, Hans de Goede ha scritto: 
> > On 03/24/2009 01:39 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Pavel Machek<pavel@ucw.cz>  wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>>>> For the record we have changed the default to strict in Fedora's
> >>>>> development branch, for 2 weeks or so now, including in the recently
> >>>>> released Fedora 11 release and we've had 0 complaints so far.
> >>>> Well, if the number of affected systems is small, this is good news.
> >>>> But this is only 2 weeks and one distribution, coverage isn't
> >>>> sufficient to claim anything yet IMHO.
> >>>>
> >>>> That being said... if there's a common consensus that switching to
> >>>> strict and dealing with fallouts is the best thing to do, and I'm the
> >>>> only one objecting to this, then I am ready to admit that I was wrong
> >>>> and let you proceed.
> >>> I believe that 'enable strict, deal with fallout' is the best
> >>> long-term strategy...
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >> the merge window for .30 is now open, what are we going to do with this issue?
> >>
> >
> > I think the consensus was to make the default strict and to merge the atk0110
> > driver, right?
> 
> Ok,
> here's a patch:
> ---
> The following patch changes the default value for option "acpi_enforce_resource"
> to strict. It enforces strict resource checking - disallowing access by native
> drivers to IO ports and memory regions claimed by ACPI firmware.
> 
> The patch is mainly aimed to block native hwmon drivers from touching
> monitoring chips that ACPI thinks it own.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>

> Index: b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2009-03-29 15:47:28.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2009-03-29 15:51:30.000000000 +0200
> @@ -259,6 +259,22 @@
>  			to assume that this machine's pmtimer latches its value
>  			and always returns good values.
>  
> +	acpi_enforce_resources=	[ACPI]
> +			{ strict,  lax, no }
			          ~ extra space here... probably not
worth fixing.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-29 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-25 21:05 [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-26  8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 10:30 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 15:16   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-29 16:29     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 18:58       ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 21:31         ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-30 14:29         ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-01 21:22           ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02  9:11             ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-02 11:38               ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 17:22                 ` [PATCH 1/2] RFC: ACPI: Interface for ACPI drivers to place quirk code which gets executed early Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:22                   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 13:08                     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 13:45                       ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 14:19                         ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 13:37                     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 17:22                 ` [PATCH 2/2] RFC: ACPI: Set enforce_resources to strict if a ATK0110 device is found in namespace Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:29                   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 11:38             ` [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 21:15       ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-04  5:52     ` Len Brown
2009-02-04  6:05       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04  8:37         ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-04 13:17           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 13:26             ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 14:20               ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 13:57                 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-10 14:08                   ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 15:32                     ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-10 16:24                       ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-27 13:27                         ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-24 12:39                           ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-24 13:21                             ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-24 13:43                               ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-24 14:29                                 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-29 20:16                               ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-29 20:33                                 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-03-29 20:55                                 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-29 22:01                                   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-30  7:36                                     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:59                                     ` Len Brown
2009-04-03  9:40                                       ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-12 12:44                     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:45         ` polling (Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources) Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090329203321.GA31857@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=kronos.it@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox