From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:01:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090329220127.GA12822@dreamland.darkstar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090329225501.0c1771f1@hyperion.delvare>
Il Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:55:01PM +0200, Jean Delvare ha scritto:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:16:17 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > Il Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:21:21PM +0100, Hans de Goede ha scritto:
> > > On 03/24/2009 01:39 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Pavel Machek<pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > >>> Hi!
> > >>>
> > >>>>> For the record we have changed the default to strict in Fedora's
> > >>>>> development branch, for 2 weeks or so now, including in the recently
> > >>>>> released Fedora 11 release and we've had 0 complaints so far.
> > >>>> Well, if the number of affected systems is small, this is good news.
> > >>>> But this is only 2 weeks and one distribution, coverage isn't
> > >>>> sufficient to claim anything yet IMHO.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That being said... if there's a common consensus that switching to
> > >>>> strict and dealing with fallouts is the best thing to do, and I'm the
> > >>>> only one objecting to this, then I am ready to admit that I was wrong
> > >>>> and let you proceed.
> > >>> I believe that 'enable strict, deal with fallout' is the best
> > >>> long-term strategy...
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >> the merge window for .30 is now open, what are we going to do with this issue?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think the consensus was to make the default strict and to merge the atk0110
> > > driver, right?
> >
> > Ok,
> > here's a patch:
> > ---
> > The following patch changes the default value for option "acpi_enforce_resource"
> > to strict. It enforces strict resource checking - disallowing access by native
> > drivers to IO ports and memory regions claimed by ACPI firmware.
> >
> > The patch is mainly aimed to block native hwmon drivers from touching
> > monitoring chips that ACPI thinks it own.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 6 +++---
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2009-03-29 15:47:28.000000000 +0200
> > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2009-03-29 15:51:30.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -259,6 +259,22 @@
> > to assume that this machine's pmtimer latches its value
> > and always returns good values.
> >
> > + acpi_enforce_resources= [ACPI]
> > + { strict, lax, no }
>
> Other options use | as a delimited between allowed values.
[...]
> The driver will fail to _bind_ to the device, this doesn't mean that the
> module will fail to load. In practice, PCI modules will still load
> while "fake" platform modules will indeed fail to load. Many hwmon
> drivers fall into the second category.
[...]
> Other that these minor details:
>
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Hi Jean,
here's a revised patch:
---
The following patch changes the default value for option "acpi_enforce_resource"
to strict. It enforces strict resource checking - disallowing access by native
drivers to IO ports and memory regions claimed by ACPI firmware.
The patch is mainly aimed to block native hwmon drivers from touching
monitoring chips that ACPI thinks it own.
Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 16 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
===================================================================
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2009-03-29 23:58:11.574893074 +0200
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 2009-03-29 23:58:31.582894852 +0200
@@ -259,6 +259,22 @@
to assume that this machine's pmtimer latches its value
and always returns good values.
+ acpi_enforce_resources= [ACPI]
+ { strict | lax | no }
+ Check for resource conflicts between native drivers
+ and ACPI OperationRegions (SystemIO and SystemMemory
+ only). IO ports and memory declared in ACPI might be
+ used by the ACPI subsystem in arbitrary AML code and
+ can interfere with legacy drivers.
+ strict (default): access to resources claimed by ACPI
+ is denied; legacy drivers trying to access reserved
+ resources will fail to bind to device using them.
+ lax: access to resources claimed by ACPI is allowed;
+ legacy drivers trying to access reserved resources
+ will bind successfully but a warning message is logged.
+ no: ACPI OperationRegions are not marked as reserved,
+ no further checks are performed.
+
agp= [AGP]
{ off | try_unsupported }
off: disable AGP support
Index: b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c 2009-03-29 23:58:11.942913535 +0200
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c 2009-03-29 23:58:31.586892815 +0200
@@ -1070,9 +1070,9 @@
* in arbitrary AML code and can interfere with legacy drivers.
* acpi_enforce_resources= can be set to:
*
- * - strict (2)
+ * - strict (default) (2)
* -> further driver trying to access the resources will not load
- * - lax (default) (1)
+ * - lax (1)
* -> further driver trying to access the resources will load, but you
* get a system message that something might go wrong...
*
@@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@
#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX 1
#define ENFORCE_RESOURCES_NO 0
-static unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX;
+static unsigned int acpi_enforce_resources = ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT;
static int __init acpi_enforce_resources_setup(char *str)
{
Luca
--
La somma dell'intelligenza sulla terra e` una costante.
La popolazione e` in aumento.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-29 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-25 21:05 [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-26 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 10:30 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 15:16 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-29 16:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 18:58 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 21:31 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-30 14:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-01 21:22 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 9:11 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-02 11:38 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] RFC: ACPI: Interface for ACPI drivers to place quirk code which gets executed early Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:22 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 13:08 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 13:45 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 14:19 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 13:37 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] RFC: ACPI: Set enforce_resources to strict if a ATK0110 device is found in namespace Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:29 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 11:38 ` [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 21:15 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-04 5:52 ` Len Brown
2009-02-04 6:05 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-04 13:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 13:26 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 14:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 13:57 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-10 14:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 15:32 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-10 16:24 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-27 13:27 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-24 12:39 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-24 13:21 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-24 13:43 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-24 14:29 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-29 20:16 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-29 20:33 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-29 20:55 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-29 22:01 ` Luca Tettamanti [this message]
2009-03-30 7:36 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:59 ` Len Brown
2009-04-03 9:40 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-12 12:44 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:45 ` polling (Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources) Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090329220127.GA12822@dreamland.darkstar.lan \
--to=kronos.it@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox