From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: simplify module_param namespace Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:26:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20090402212625.GA8502@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <200903071328.28113.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200903110927.12792.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20090311145124.696b2448.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200903120907.20055.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:40934 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756189AbZDBVY0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:24:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Rusty Russell , Stephen Rothwell , yakui_zhao , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" > + > +processor-objs += processor_core.o processor_throttling.o \ > + processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o > +ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ > +processor-objs += processor_perflib.o > +endif It would be nicer to do: processor-y := processor_core.o processor_throttling.o processor-y += processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o processor-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += processor_perflib.o Assuming processor-objs was not assinged before in this file. Sam