From: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
To: lenb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 1/2] acpi x86: Cleanup acpi_cpufreq structures related to aperf/mperf
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:26:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090406182723.927683000@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090406182606.706570000@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: 0001-acpi-x86-Cleanup-acpi_cpufreq-structures-related-to.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3383 bytes --]
Change structure name to make the code cleaner and simpler. No
functionality change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 42 +++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 19f6b9d..340bdbe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -241,23 +241,23 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask)
return cmd.val;
}
-struct perf_cur {
+struct perf_pair {
union {
struct {
u32 lo;
u32 hi;
} split;
u64 whole;
- } aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
+ } aperf, mperf;
};
static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
{
- struct perf_cur *cur = _cur;
+ struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi);
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi);
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0);
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0);
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct perf_cur cur;
+ struct perf_pair cur;
unsigned int perf_percent;
unsigned int retval;
@@ -294,39 +294,37 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
* Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
* an approximate value.
*/
- if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) {
+ if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
int shift_count;
u32 h;
- h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi);
+ h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
shift_count = fls(h);
- cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
}
- if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) {
+ if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
int shift_count = 7;
- cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
}
- if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo)
- perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) /
- cur.mperf_cur.split.lo;
+ if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
+ perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) / cur.mperf.split.lo;
else
perf_percent = 0;
#else
- if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) {
+ if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
int shift_count = 7;
- cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
}
- if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole)
- perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) /
- cur.mperf_cur.whole;
+ if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
+ perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole;
else
perf_percent = 0;
--
1.6.0.6
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-06 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 18:26 [patch 0/2] acpi x86: Make aperf mperf MSR usage in acpi_cpufreq read only venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-04-06 18:26 ` venkatesh.pallipadi [this message]
2009-04-07 5:34 ` [patch 1/2] acpi x86: Cleanup acpi_cpufreq structures related to aperf/mperf Len Brown
2009-04-06 18:26 ` [patch 2/2] acpi x86: Make aperf/mperf MSR access in acpi_cpufreq read_only venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-04-07 5:35 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090406182723.927683000@intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).