From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:13:29 +0200 Message-ID: <200904201113.31371.trenn@suse.de> References: <20090415225348.GW8311@plum> <20090416224507.GA31984@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52433 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbZDTJNd (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:13:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Matthew Garrett , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday 20 April 2009 07:13:51 Len Brown wrote: > FYI, > Thanks to Ebay, I now have a T60:-) Hmm, Lenovo sold a lot different machines as T60. I found an acpidump of a T60 here without any _PPC function at all. > and so i put the DSDT here: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13139 > > I'll poke at this in more detail soon... Ingo, can you place yours somewhere too, please. This one should be taken into account for _PPC code changes as it seem to implement some corner case. Thanks, Thomas