From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] i915/acpi: add lid status notification and detection Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:26:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20090522012611.GA3136@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20090513115734.338b7d55@jbarnes-g45> <1242264144.3773.415.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090519171545.GA17801@srcf.ucam.org> <1242896273.32574.10.camel@rzhang-dt> <20090521093418.3f1a03d5@jbarnes-g45> <4A15FE57.7040002@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:36217 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751003AbZEVB0P (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2009 21:26:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A15FE57.7040002@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Fu Michael Cc: Jesse Barnes , Zhang Rui , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , lenb@kernel.org, "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:22:31AM +0800, Fu Michael wrote: > Jesse Barnes wrote: >> So is that two acks for the patch? If so, should it be split or can it >> just go in through the i915 driver tree? >> >> Len? (Patch attached for reference.) >> >> Thanks, >> > Jesse, Just talked with Rui, the above status is based on "BIOS upgrade > or FW fix is acceptable as a bug fix solution". are you ok with this? :) > Many lid status has to be fixed via action such as DSDT upgrade... Really? As I said, I'd be surprised if this is in any way common. What's the exact problem description? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org