From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop: no need to unblock rfkill on load
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:21:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609092112.GE7682@kamineko.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A2E1DE3.4020509@tuffmail.co.uk>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:31:31AM +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:36:58PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:31 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>>
>>>> The re-written rfkill core ensures rfkill devices are initialized to
>>>> the system default state. The core calls set_block after registration
>>>> so the driver shouldn't need to.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>>>>
>>> Good catch, thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Just to confirm, is this patch going to sit in the wireless-testing tree
>> and you will submit it for inclusion together with the rfkill work
>> right?
>>
>
> Yes. I probably didn't need to ping you at this point.
>
> It just bothered me because I was effectively reverting a recent commit.
> I figuired I should let you know. In case it didn't work, when it was
> merged you'd know why I did it and who to blame. But there is always Git
> history for that :-).
Errm... now that I look at that patch more closely, the code you're
modifying is not upstream either.
Anyway thanks for the ping, I'll take a look at what's going on in the
wireless-testing tree ;)
cheers
--
mattia
:wq!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 10:31 [PATCH] sony-laptop: no need to unblock rfkill on load Alan Jenkins
2009-06-08 10:36 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1244457418.18863.8.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-08 22:49 ` Mattia Dongili
[not found] ` <20090608224915.GA4583-pM3i+3kAS8Rg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-09 8:31 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-06-09 9:21 ` Mattia Dongili [this message]
2009-06-09 9:30 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090609092112.GE7682@kamineko.org \
--to=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox